Indicator 5.1.5 - Value of unmarketed nontimber forest products and forest-based services
supporting indicator
Canada's forests provide many nonmarket values
that are important to Canadians. Some of these are
recreational, passive (existence and bequest values),
and societal (ecological, scientific, and educational
values). It is difficult to assess these values because
they are not traded in markets and are generally provided
unpriced or provided at a price that does not
reflect their true cost.
Current national information on the nonmarket value
of forest products and services is therefore lacking.
The previous C&I report (CCFM 2000) used information
from the national survey
The Importance of
Nature to Canadians to report on the economic impact
of the recreational use of Canada's forests (Environment
Canada 1999). Since this information has yet
to be updated, an analysis of national forest recreational
use trends is not possible. Instead, this indicator
is being reported through a case study of
economic benefits associated with one type of nonmarket
value, namely recreational use, associated
with a limited number of protected areas in Ontario.
The addition of passive use values and societal values
to this study would increase, and more accurately
reflect, the total benefit value. Still, the study illustrates
the type of data that is helpful in assessing
nonmarket values. Although it is difficult to assess
passive use values and societal values, new methods
are being developed and tested by economists. Further
nonmarket valuation studies are needed to support
this indicator.
CASE STUDY: Significant nonmarket benefits
derived from protected areas
in Ontario
Ontario's Living Legacy (OLL) is the result of Ontario's
Lands for Life resource planning and public consultation
on crown lands. OLL, which was announced
in 1999 as a natural heritage protection program,
created 378 new parks and protected areas totaling
2.4 million ha. Nine areas are of such unique natural
heritage that they have been declared Signature Sites
demanding protection. The Ontario Ministry of Natural
Resources initiated a study to assess and estimate
the value of the social and economic benefits associated
with eight of the sites.
The total value associated with the sites was estimated
at $35 130 000, approximately 29% of which
was derived from nonmarket benefits. Nonmarket
benefits were computed by determining the difference
between the value that visitors associated with their
experience and the actual expenditures to access the
sites (Table 5.1c). This study, although limited to only
a few sites in Ontario, suggests that forest areas provide
substantial nonmarket benefits to Canadians
that are not reflected in user expenditures alone.
Table 5.1c Benefits associated with Ontario's Living Legacy Signature Sites (millions $). (Source: Engel Consulting Group et al. 2003)
| Signature sites |
Nonmarket value
|
Market value
|
Total value |
Consumer surplusa |
Expenditures |
|
| Killarney Provincial Park |
3.26 |
5.36 |
8.62 |
| Spanish River Valley |
1.07 |
1.36 |
2.43 |
| Kawartha Highlands |
3.24 |
9.13 |
12.37 |
| Algoma Headwaters |
0.20 |
0.72 |
0.92 |
| Nagagamisis Central Plateau Complex |
0.96 |
1.46 |
2.42 |
| Lake Nipigon Basin |
0.18 |
0.97 |
1.15 |
| St. Raphael |
0.27 |
1.85 |
2.12 |
| Woodland Caribou Provincial Park |
0.87 |
4.83 |
5.70 |
| Total |
10.05 |
25.68 |
35.73 |
a Consumer surplus is the value users placed on their experience excluding their actual expenditures.
In addition to indicating the importance of forest
recreation, the total economic value provides baseline
data that can be used to assess net changes in
benefits that are expected to be caused by changes
in policy or management. Basic data on nonmarket
values such as recreational use data (e.g., the number
of visitors, their place of residence, and their activities
at the site) need to continue to be collected to assess
the total value of the forest resource.
This presents a major challenge because recreational
use data for public lands is rarely collected, especially
nationally, despite the recognized need for this information.
Although even limited data can be useful
in assessing trends, it will be essential to increase
the effort devoted to periodic national studies of
nonmarket values to better assess the overall value
of forests in Canada.