Indicator 6.3.2 - Education attainment levels in forest-based communities
core indicator
Education attainment is an important measure of
forest community well-being and resilience because
it offers a measure of human capital in the community.
Human capital refers to the productive capacity of
individuals in the form of skills and capabilities that
can be used in the production of goods and services in
a region. Furthermore, communities marked by high
levels of human capital are likely better equipped to
adapt to changing social and economic conditions and
more capable of maintaining a competitive advantage
over communities with lower levels of human capital.
Human capital involves other skills and abilities
such as entrepreneurship and general levels of human
health, but education attainment levels offer a useful
proxy for human capital at the community level
(Parkins and Beckley 2001). Education attainment
levels are reported as the proportion of residents
in a CSD who have obtained at least a bachelor's
degree for both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
forest-dependent, nondependent, and other
resource-dependent CSDs.
Within the non-Aboriginal, multiresource-dependent
rural populations of Canada, the proportion of residents
with a university degree is 7.2%, which is slightly
higher than the average in forest-dependent and other
single resource dependent CSDs (6.4%) (Table 6.3c). The
relationship between forest dependence and education
attainment across Canada is mixed, with higher
levels of education attainment associated with greater
forest dependence in a few regions such as Manitoba
and Saskatchewan and the reverse in other regions
with available data. Significant negative relationships
exist in Quebec and British Columbia where the proportion
of residents with university degrees drops from
6.6% and 11.6% in multiresource-dependent CSDs to
4.5% and 8.6% in forest-dependent CSDs, respectively.
Table 6.3c Average proportion of residents who have obtained a bachelor's degree or higher in non-Aboriginal census subdivisions (%).
| Region |
Multiresource-dependent |
Other single resource dependent |
Forest-dependent |
| Canada |
7.2a* |
6.4b |
6.4b |
| NL |
4.7a |
3.6a |
4.6a |
| PE |
9.1a |
7.0a |
nd |
| NS |
10.7a |
5.7b |
10.1a/b |
| NB |
7.4a |
7.5a |
5.9a |
| QC |
6.6a |
5.8a |
4.5b |
| ON |
8.2a |
8.0a |
7.0a |
| MB |
7.9a |
7.2a |
8.7a |
| SK |
6.8a |
6.6a |
7.5a |
| AB |
8.8a |
6.8b |
7.5a/b |
| BC |
11.6a |
8.1b |
8.6b |
| YT |
6.9 |
nd |
nd |
| NT |
5.3a |
9.0a |
nd |
| NU |
6.4a |
6.0a |
nd |
*Any two average percentages in a region that are not followed by the same letter are significantly different (P‹0.05).
nd: Not determined due to insufficient data.
Results from this indicator suggest that non-Aboriginal
forest-dependent communities are generally not better
or are slightly worse than other rural communities
in terms of their formal education attainment levels.
The proportion of residents in Aboriginal CSDs with
at least a bachelor's degree hovers around 4.5% for
most of the country, except for British Columbia where
the percentage of degree holders dips to 3.1% in forestdependent
CSDs, and in the Territories where the percentage
of degree holders peaks at 7.2% (Table 6.3d).
The analysis of Aboriginal CSDs shows no significant
relationship between forest dependence and education
attainment. Therefore, Aboriginal forest-dependent
CSDs are generally in no advantaged or disadvantaged
position with respect to formal levels of education
when compared with nonforest-dependent
Aboriginal communities.
Table 6.3d Average proportion of residents who have obtained a bachelor's degree or higher in Aboriginal census subdivisions (%).
| Region |
Nonforest-dependent |
Forest-dependent |
| Canada |
4.1 |
4.4 ns |
| Atlantic |
4.8 |
4.3 ns |
| Central |
3.6 |
4.4 ns |
| Prairies |
4.1 |
4.7 ns |
| BC |
4.0 |
3.1 ns |
| Territories |
4.9 |
7.2 ns |
ns: Not significantly different from the average percentage with degree in nonforest-dependent communities in the same region (P‹0.05).