Indicator 6.3.1 - Economic diversity index of forest-based communities
core indicator
Economic diversity is a measure of the uniformity
of employment across all sectors of the economy.
This index, which is calculated by determining the
portion of total personal income derived from one
sector divided by the total income from all sectors,
is a common measure of economic diversity in the
forest sector (Christensen et al. 2000). The index is
based on the major groupings of Standard Industrial
Classifications using 2001 census data and has a
range from 0 to 4.31, with the higher figures reflecting
higher economic diversity.
As a measure of economic diversity, this index
provides some insight into the range of employment
opportunities in the census subdivisions (CSDs). More
economically diverse CSDs will be better positioned
to absorb and respond positively to various shocks to
the economy. If one sector contracts, there are opportunities
locally for employees to be absorbed into
other sectors of the economy.
Table 6.3a shows a somewhat paradoxical relationship
between the levels of forest dependence and
economic diversity. Intuitively, one can assume that
with greater dependence on a single sector the economic
diversity index would be lower. Instead, this
analysis shows the opposite trend where, for example,
multiresource-dependent CSDs at the national level
report a significantly lower diversity score than forestdependent
CSDs. This positive relationship between
increasing forest dependence and increasing economic
diversity is very strong in Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan,
and Alberta. Results suggest that, in general terms,
the forest-dependent CSDs marked by high economic
diversity benefit from some economic activity in other
sectors of the economy as well. These results may
indicate the extent to which forest-based economies
attract a wide range of economic activity that are not
related to forestry or they could be due to induced
and indirect jobs in other sectors that spin off of
forestry employment.
Table 6.3a Average economic diversity for non-Aboriginal census subdivisions.
| Region |
Multiresource-dependent |
Other single resource dependent |
Forest-dependent |
| Canada |
1.21a* |
1.1b |
1.62c |
| NL |
0.71a |
0.94a |
0.76a |
| PE |
1.09a |
1.21a |
nd |
| NS |
2.43a |
1.86b |
2.74a |
| NB |
1.47a |
1.62a |
1.64a |
| QC |
1.3a |
1.22a |
1.29a |
| ON |
2.01a/b |
2.5a |
1.85b |
| MB |
1.51a |
1.2b |
1.61a/b |
| SK |
0.43a |
0.6b |
1.71c |
| AB |
1.19a |
1.92b |
2.31b |
| BC |
1.84a |
1.5a |
1.9a |
| YT |
0.95 |
nd |
nd |
| NT |
1.11a |
1.39a |
nd |
| NU |
1.47a |
2.11a |
nd |
*Any two economic diversity values in a region that are not followed
by the same letter are significantly different ( P<0.05).
nd: Not determined due to insufficient data.
Results from the analysis of Aboriginal CSDs
(Table 6.3b) are similar to the analysis of non-
Aboriginal CSDs. Forest dependence is positively
related to economic diversity in most regions of
Canada. For example, forest-dependent CSDs at the
national level report a significantly higher diversity
score of 1.37 compared with 0.55 for nonforestdependent
CSDs. The relationship is statistically
significant in all regions except for Atlantic Canada.
Table 6.3b Average economic diversity for Aboriginal census subdivisions.
| Region |
Nonforest-dependent |
Forest-dependent |
| Canada |
0.55 |
1.37* |
| Atlantic |
0.83 |
1.18 ns |
| Central |
0.55 |
1.33* |
| Prairies |
0.68 |
1.42* |
| BC |
0.08 |
1.26* |
| Territories |
1.08 |
1.66* |
*Significantly different from the economic diversity for nonforest-dependent communities in the same region (P<0.05).
ns: Not significantly different from nonforest-dependent CSDs.
The analysis of Aboriginal CSDs must be interpreted
cautiously due to the strong positive relationship
between CSD size and economic diversity. The
forest-dependent communities in this analysis are
larger than the nonforest-dependent communities,
which will influence the degree of economic diversity
because larger centers naturally tend to be more
economically diverse.